Losing sight of women's rights (again): a response to Cowan et al.

Neandertal taxonomy reconsidered...again: a response to Harvati et al..

The debate concerning the fate of the Neandertals has been ongoing since shortly after the discovery of the Feldhofer 1 skeleton in 1856. Were the Neandertals an extinct side-branch in human evolution or were they ancestral to modern humans? If they were an extinct side-branch, reproductively isolated from modern humans, then they should be classified as a distinct species, Homo neanderthalensi...

Public Participation: Methods Matter; A Response to Boaz et al.

Neandertal taxonomy reconsidered . again : a response to Harvati et al . ( 2004 )

The debate concerning the fate of the Neandertals has been ongoing since shortly after the discovery of the Feldhofer 1 skeleton in 1856. Were the Neandertals an extinct side-branch in human evolution or were they ancestral to modern humans? If they were an extinct side-branch, reproductively isolated from modern humans, then they should be classified as a distinct species, Homo neanderthalensi...

Response to Sadek et al. and Kotlikoff et al.

Ditte Caroline Andersen,1,2,* Charlotte Harken Jensen,1 and Søren Paludan Sheikh1,3 1Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark 2Clinical Institute/University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense C, Denmark 3Institute of Molecular Medicine/University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense C, Den...

In Response to Fakruddin et al. and Apostolou et al

In Response to Fakruddin et al. dicted to result in substitutions of amino acids at the and Apostolou et al. corresponding positions in the protein sequence. In each of these cases, individual tumor DNA samples possessed the same sequence as that of the corresponding cell line. We agree with many of the above findings, including To determine if the divergent sequences represented the frequency ...